Bridging the gap in rice production

|
From the 1960s
to the 1980s, rice productivity kept up with rising population. In the 1990s, rice
production began to grow more slowly than population. (Source: FAOSTAT, 1998) |
Rice is the most important staple
crop in the world, providing half the world's people with 80 percent of their diet. Thanks
to the high-yielding varieties and improved farming methods of the Green Revolution, rice
production grew quickly in the 1970s and 1980s, easily keeping up with population demand.
But during the 1990s production began to slow. To address this concern and find ways to
feed the growing population, FAO recently held a global Expert Consultation on Yield Gap
and Productivity Decline in Rice Production.
"We'll need to increase
current rice production from nearly 600 million tonnes annually to almost 800 million by
the year 2025 if we want to keep up with population growth," says Mr Nguu Nguyen,
Agricultural Officer in FAO's Crop and Grassland Service. "And to make sure the
growth is sustainable, we'll need to do it using less land, labour, water and
pesticides."
Experts first began to notice
the decline in rice productivity in Thailand and India, and then confirmed it during
long-term trials in the Philippines. Although no one can say with certainty exactly what
led to the drop, it's probably due to a combination of factors, says Mr Nguyen. Intensive
cropping may harm soil make-up. Irrigation, which encourages high yield, also can increase
soil salinity. In some places, the scarcity of land and water impedes improved
productivity. And as specially bred varieties reach their yield limit, there's simply much
less room for improvement.
Part of the difficulty in
explaining the decline stems from regional and cropping differences. For example, in many
irrigated systems in Africa, the slowdown appears to be due to poor infrastructure and
management, whereas in Asia prolonged soil wetness and nutrient depletion may be the
culprits .
Experts at the consultation
considered these downward trends worldwide and also noticed some anomalies. For instance,
in the same period, Australia, Egypt and the United States managed to boost rice
production, leading some to conclude that the negative trend wasn't inevitable.
In Egypt, for instance, a
government-supported rice research programme helped raise production from 5.8 tonnes per
hectare to 8.5 tonnes over ten years. Government policies facilitated rice production by
increasing farmer participation, improving water and pest management and providing credit
schemes.
Australia devised a 'rice
check' system that helps farmers to identify which factors are causing slowdowns so they
can respond with focussed actions.
Participants at the
consultation agreed that improved research will help to clarify the trend and lead to a
more effective response. They also devised some definitions and recommendations that will
aid future research and policy.
To quantify how much
improvement can be made in a given cultivation, the experts identified two measures of
yield gap. Yield gap 1 is the difference between yield produced under ideal research
conditions and that produced under an average farmer's conditions. Yield gap 2 compares
the average yield of the top 10 percent of farmers in a location with the average yield of
all farmers in that location. Participants outlined the causes of yield gap and guidelines
on how to close it. They also proposed a check list, similar to the one developed in
Australia, which included factors affecting rice yield, for example, seed quality, water
management and crop protection from weeds, pests and disease.
Finally, they agreed on a
series of recommendations for action at the national and global level:
Increase farmer awareness about balanced
fertilizer use.
Warn about the dangers of overly intensive
cropping.
Support breeding programs to develop new
varieties able to consistently produce high yields, even in the presence of abiotic and
biotic stresses.
Conduct fewer but more targeted and longer
term research experiments.
Monitor yield and productivity trends in
select pilot sites with an emphasis on micro-level investigation including state seed
farms and farmers' fields.
Continue cross-country network research on
yield and productivity trends in major rice-based cropping systems.
|